Which pairing correctly identifies a risk and a mitigation when using mobile devices for Army communications?

Which pairing correctly identifies a risk and a mitigation when using mobile devices for Army communications?

• A. Battery life risk; Mitigation: only use wired devices.
• B. Malware risk; Mitigation: ignore warnings.
• C. Risk: lost device or data leakage; Mitigation: device encryption, MDM policies, remote wipe.
• D. Data accuracy risk; Mitigation: unsupervised access.

Answer: (C)

When you’re using mobile devices for Army communications, a primary risk is losing the device or having data leak if it’s lost or stolen. The best mitigation combines device-level protections and management controls: device encryption to render data unreadable without the key, mobile device management (MDM) policies to enforce security configurations and controls, and the ability to perform a remote wipe if the device goes missing. Encryption keeps sensitive information safe even if the device is out of reach, MDM ensures the device stays compliant with security standards (strong passcodes, restricted apps, updated software), and remote wipe provides a way to erase sensitive data from a lost device, preventing unauthorized access. The other pairings don’t align as effectively. A focus on battery life with a mitigation like “only use wired devices” doesn’t directly address protecting data or maintaining security in mobility scenarios. Ignoring malware warnings leaves systems exposed to threats rather than preventing them. And proposing unsupervised access as a mitigation for data accuracy risk would undermine security and control, contradicting best practices for protecting information in mobile environments.

When you’re using mobile devices for Army communications, a primary risk is losing the device or having data leak if it’s lost or stolen. The best mitigation combines device-level protections and management controls: device encryption to render data unreadable without the key, mobile device management (MDM) policies to enforce security configurations and controls, and the ability to perform a remote wipe if the device goes missing. Encryption keeps sensitive information safe even if the device is out of reach, MDM ensures the device stays compliant with security standards (strong passcodes, restricted apps, updated software), and remote wipe provides a way to erase sensitive data from a lost device, preventing unauthorized access.

The other pairings don’t align as effectively. A focus on battery life with a mitigation like “only use wired devices” doesn’t directly address protecting data or maintaining security in mobility scenarios. Ignoring malware warnings leaves systems exposed to threats rather than preventing them. And proposing unsupervised access as a mitigation for data accuracy risk would undermine security and control, contradicting best practices for protecting information in mobile environments.